Reviews for ConsistencyIsKey | Editor World

ConsistencyIsKey Reviews and Ratings

Bar Chart

ConsistencyIsKey

Average Rating: 4.94/5 (from 181 ratings)
Rating:
5/5
Review:

The language editing is good and the revision is very careful. Thanks.
Date:
02/12/22 4:41 AM
Number of words:
7,279
Service:
1-day editing
Rating:
5/5
Review:

Thank you very much for advising me on many details and checking the school's website! 
Date:
11/08/21 11:52 PM
Number of words:
6,090
Service:
1-day editing
Rating:
5/5
Review:

Very good editing. You caught all the flaws. Thank you very much. I strongly recommend editor ConsistencyIsKey.
Date:
11/06/21 10:23 PM
Number of words:
1,600
Service:
1-day editing
Rating:
4/5
Review:

The editor is ever good at editing. 

Good experience all the time.
Date:
11/01/21 10:57 PM
Number of words:
6,530
Service:
5-day editing
Rating:
5/5
Review:

Thank you very much!
Date:
08/28/21 1:03 AM
Number of words:
6,735
Service:
3-day editing
Rating:
5/5
Review:

He proofreads meticulously.
Date:
08/09/21 4:48 AM
Number of words:
8,010
Service:
5-day editing
Rating:
5/5
Review:

Truly great editing, with many useful suggestions. 
Date:
06/23/21 9:12 AM
Number of words:
990
Service:
1-day editing
Rating:
5/5
Review:

Thanks for your excellent work! I have revised the paper and letters following your instruction. I just make a little change. Would you please, if it is ok, help me to revise the following 254 words? Of course, I will pay for it, if it is too much as a quick revise:

In a model with a continuum of imperfectly substitutable laborers and endogenous skill premiums, this paper derives optimal tax formulas as a function of social welfare weights and a small set of estimable statistics. It first demonstrates that under an additively separable utility, differential capital tax, basing on capital's effect on skill premiums, is desirable, while nonlinear capital tax is not desirable. The paper then explores both uniform and sector-specific capital income tax (UCIT and SCIT), where sector is identified by the type of laborer working in it. Top labor income tax as well as the top SCIT rate are provided. Numerical application to U.S. taxation delivers an inverted U-shaped relationship between the SCIT rate and sectoral wage. Reform from UCIT to SCIT compresses wage gaps between the top ten percent and others considerably, and especially favors median-income individuals. Their wages are increased by $3.8\%$. Due to production inefficiency, switching from UCIT to SCIT implies a small welfare gains ($%0.07\%\sim 0.22\%$ in consumption-equivalent terms).

 

Third, we consider additively separable period utility. This assumption abstracts the problem from the interaction between endogenous skill premium and complementarity between consumption and leisure, both of which activate the effects of policy on binding incentive constraints.

 

A tax or subsidy on initial capital inputs is generally needed to make the tax reform considered in our welfare analysis so that the aggregate capital inputs can jump to the steady-state value at the beginning of period 1. See <cite>werning_optimal_2007</cite> for the reasonability of initial wealth tax and flexible initial capital inputs.
Date:
03/13/21 9:10 AM
Number of words:
4,328
Service:
2-day editing
Rating:
5/5
Review:

Great work and instruction!
Date:
03/06/21 7:56 AM
Number of words:
10,491
Service:
5-day editing
Rating:
5/5
Review:

Great work. Thank you so much.
Date:
11/22/20 4:30 AM
Number of words:
990
Service:
2-day editing
Rating:
5/5
Review:

This is an absolutly five-star editor! 
Date:
10/07/20 9:01 PM
Number of words:
12,133
Service:
2-day editing
Rating:
5/5
Review:

Thank you so much. The editing is thorough and really helpful!!!
Date:
10/06/20 10:44 PM
Number of words:
6,564
Service:
2-day editing
Rating:
5/5
Review:

Very precise and timely! Thank you!!
Date:
10/03/20 11:02 PM
Number of words:
6,171
Service:
3-day editing
Rating:
5/5
Review:

Working with ConsistencyIsKey was easy. Will use her services again! 
Date:
09/06/20 6:34 PM
Number of words:
54,601
Service:
>7-day editing
Rating:
5/5
Review:

This editor is consistently good!
Date:
09/01/20 10:42 PM
Number of words:
3,454
Service:
1-day editing
Rating:
5/5
Review:

I am satisfied with the editing of this editor.
Date:
08/20/20 3:06 AM
Number of words:
5,000
Service:
5-day editing
Rating:
5/5
Review:

Such a wonderful knowledge of APA formatting! I am so grateful for this editor's careful eye and wonderful editing skills. Would reccomend to others and I plan on using these services again!
Date:
08/07/20 12:27 PM
Number of words:
4,546
Service:
5-day editing
Rating:
5/5
Review:

She did a fantastic job on editing by content to be posted on my blog. Thank you! 
Date:
07/21/20 8:21 AM
Number of words:
200
Service:
1-day editing
Rating:
5/5
Review:

I asked ConsistencyIsKey to review and edit my manuscripts and ConsistencyIsKey has been my best editor. Thank you!
Date:
06/24/20 9:15 PM
Number of words:
6,597
Service:
5-day editing
Rating:
5/5
Review:

Thank you so much for the hard work on revising my manucript. As aways it's of very high-standard and having lots of useful suggestions and comments:)
Date:
05/05/20 1:18 AM
Number of words:
750
Service:
1-day editing